Incumbents are indicated with *
Candidates proceeding to the municipal election on November 5th are indicated with †
Jump to:
Annissa Essaibi-George*†
(pdf of answers)
Michael Flaherty*†
(pdf of answers)
Althea Garrison*†
(no answers submitted)
David Halbert†
(pdf of answers)
Julia Mejia†
(pdf of answers)
Erin Murphy†
(pdf of answers)
Alejandra St.Guillen†
(pdf of answers)
Michelle Wu*†
(pdf of answers)
About the Candidate |
1. How do you move around your community and get to where you need to go? |
2. What is a particularly dangerous problem or location in your community for people walking, biking, taking transit, or for people with disabilities that you'd like to see addressed? |
3. Why do you think people who care about walking, biking, transit, and mobility issues should vote for you? |
Annissa Essaibi-George |
I use different modes of transportation to get around my community, to work, and community events. When I am transporting my four boys to sports and school events, and when I commute in to City Hall, I usually drive. |
Our transportation infrastructure is entirely car-centric, relegating pedestrians, bikes, and other mode of transportation to the “extra space” after car lanes and parking space have been allocated. Further, distracted drivers pose a tremendous risk to non-car users of all kinds. Though the city has used pylons and markers, one of the most dangerous places to be in the city is in a bike lane or crosswalk. We need to take every action possible to refocus drivers and improve safety for non-car users. |
I have been a strong proponent for investing in infrastructure and programming to make Boston safer and easier to travel. I have supported the creation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), more funding for protected bike lanes, and other important traffic calming measures. I advocated for and the budget was increased this year to include a Crash Analyst to work with the BPD & BTD to analyze accidents and make recommendations to improve safety after an incident. I have joined Councilor Wu in fighting MBTA fare increases. I have fully embraced Vision Zero and will continue my advocacy when re-elected. |
Michael Flaherty |
As an At-large City Councilor, a normal day includes meetings in all corners of the city, most of the time on a tight timeline. As such, I generally drive or carpool with staff to each of these meetings. I try to take the T when it is practical for my schedule, but this is a constant reminder that we need to improve the quality of public transportation in Boston so that the use of a car is not a necessity for reliable cross-city travel. |
As a Boston City Councilor At-Large, I have seen and/or heard from residents about the following locations: |
I have seen firsthand the daily frustrations of Boston residents and commuters as the region is plagued by traffic and our public transportation system continues to provide unacceptable levels of service. I am willing to support any method with the proper research behind it that can alleviate any of these transit issues. These include protected bike lanes, lower speed limits, illuminated and raised crosswalks, speed bumps, and road diets. We also need to work with the state to improve the MBTA across the board. |
David Halbert |
I use a combination of methods depending on where I am going and when. Currently I primarily travel via my personal vehicle due to logistical demands as a city wide candidate. I prefer to utilize public transportation or walk whenever possible. |
The section of Morton Street (state route 203) from just west of the intersection of Morton and Harvard, until Cemetary Road in Jamaica Plain is very dangerous. This is a high speed, heavily trafficked thoroughfare that has no protected bike lanes and no sidewalks for pedestrians or those with mobility challenges. In addition to being dangerous, this lack of infrastructure further separates Dorchester/Mattapan from the Forest Hills neighborhood. |
I realize that as we make policy recommendations on transportation issues we must prioritize equity as well. Striking this balance means thinking creatively about transportation. For example, I have been a strong advocate for creating more walkable neighborhoods across Boston, with everyday amenities nearby - thus reducing the need for residents to drive as often. I will bring this approach to all transportation discussions on the Council, along with the humility to seek input and assistance from stakeholders as I am not a transit policy expert. |
Julia Mejia |
I rely on my car because my lack of access to public transit essentially forces me to contribute to our city’s worst in the nation traffic and the accompanying environmental/public health risks. |
Our public transit system is in complete crisis - it is unreliable and becoming consistently unsafe to ride. The lack of protected bike lanes throughout the city prevents more people from transitioning to biking. Street diets are needed in multiple high traffic neighborhoods to address both congestion and pedestrian safety. |
I experience the inequities of mobility in our city and am ready to address these issues. I live in a low income community that doesn’t have easy access to public transit, requiring many folks to get a car just to get to work, leading to more traffic, pollution and accidents on our roads. This enables me to address transit issues from the perspective of income inequality that is necessary to equitably solve these problems and make Boston a city where all of its residents can easily and sustainably move from point A to point B. |
Erin Murphy |
Walking and by car |
Speed enforcement, better sidewalk snow clearance, fix the T |
I will work for a new Red Line station in Dorchester and reforming the MBTA |
Alejandra St.Guillen |
I generally combine the use of my car with public transportation. I take my son to daycare in Roslindale and thus drive from West Roxbury to Roslindale and then take public transportation if I’m going downtown. Generally, if I’m not going downtown, I will often drive from location to location to limit my travel time. I live very close to a Main Street district and thus am able to walk to places for leisure activities or light shopping. |
In my immediate community of West Roxbury, Centre street between Lagrange to South has been a particularly dangerous area for pedestrians. There are two lanes going in each direction and there have been a number of accidents (including fatalities). It’s also not a bike-friendly stretch. As I knock doors across the city, I have found many areas lack proper infrastructure for people with disabilities - sidewalks ending suddenly, sidewalks that nearly impassable with a stroller (as I often have my son with me) and I’m sure extremely dangerous for older people and people with disabilities. |
I would be a strong advocate for increased mobility options and safety across the city. My top priorities for advancing sustainability, especially in transit dependent communities will be working with advocates and city/state agencies to upgrade core transportation assets across the city and reinvesting in neglected transportation links, including protected and connected bike lanes. |
Michelle Wu |
I commute to City Hall from Roslindale (most days with at least one of my kids) by taking the Orange Line from Forest Hills to State Street. A few times per month, we may change to catch the Commuter Rail from Back Bay Station to Roslindale Village on the way home. Since the implementation of the inbound morning rush hour dedicated bus lane on Washington Street, it’s been much easier and more reliable to take any of the buses (34, 34E, 36, etc.) from Roslindale Square to Forest Hills. Outside of this route, I also walk or use public transit or bike share to get to meetings across the city. |
Too many streets across Boston are too dangerous for people who rely on them everyday. My shared campaign office is near Dudley Square, and nearly all the streets leading in and out of the area are among those with the worst crash rates, with conditions encouraging speeding and making it difficult to cross in a single cycle. Sadly these conditions are common throughout the city, and the top issue that I hear about when knocking on doors is how dangerous it feels to walk on even our residential streets due to speeding cars trying to avoid horrible traffic on main roads and unsafe street design. |
Throughout my tenure on the City Council, I have fought for a more sustainable transportation future. From fighting for investments in cycling infrastructure and improvements in bus service, to helping expand access to youth T passes, to organizing a system-wide canvass of the MBTA alongside a coalition of commuters, advocacy organizations, and elected officials, I have worked to highlight the experiences of communities and people in pushing for transportation solutions focused on equity, scale, and urgency. Transit access and equity is fundamental, and we can't let it be only a state issue. |
Policy Proposals |
1. How will you ensure implementation of the infrastructure changes needed to slow traffic on your community's streets, and improve crosswalks and intersections to make them safer for people who are walking and using mobility assistive devices? |
2. How will you improve the reach, frequency, and quality of public transit in Boston? |
3. How will you ensure fast-tracked implementation of a city-wide network of off-street paths and protected bike lanes on major thoroughfares and connecting streets that are safe and comfortable for people of all ages and abilities? |
Annissa Essaibi-George |
Constituents are most knowledgeable about their block, street, neighborhood and are bet positioned to help us identify where infrastructure can be improved to increase safety. I frequently hear from constituents about trouble spots and we work with BTD and others to improve the infrastructure to address these concerns. The Boston Bike Union and other advocate groups know the trouble spots for bikes and we need to fast-track improvements. I have advocated for raised crosswalks in front of our schools, especially for elementary schools, at playgrounds, senior housing, and senior centers. |
We need to place a greater emphasis on funding projects and initiatives that makes public transportation more accessible in Boston. Our broken public transportation network not only creates commuting to work, school, and moving around ones community much more difficult, but it costs our economy billions of dollars annually, and pushes occasional users of public transit to use their cars – further exacerbating the problem of traffic congestion. Boston is a world-class city, and we must have a transportation network that matches our reputation. While there are limited measures the City can take to fix the broken MBTA, I still have used my role as a City Councilor as a bully pulpit to advocate for significant capital investments in train infrastructure. I have and will continued to advocate for BRT through our commercial corridors, increased City investments in making our streets, sidewalks, and bike paths safer, better connected, and more accessible. We also need to evaluate the frequency of resetting our traffic signal system across the City. This will help the flow of traffic, properly slow traffic and increase the transit network in particular for buses and the Green Line. |
Boston lags behind many other major cities, because we do not prioritize off-street paths and protected lanes. Boston is an old city and our streets are tight, but we can work within our older design to identify main thoroughfares for bikes, much like the Southwest Corridor, to get bikes their own space. Two examples of this are the Harborwalk in Dorchester (around the gas tank) which would open one corridor to the south and adding protected lanes to Mass Ave to Melnea Cass to accommodate a high volume of bike traffic. Realigning our urban highways, like Rutherford Ave in Charlestown would connect Downtown to the North. The realignment of the Pike in Allston will allow for a connection to West Station, Brighton, and beyond. More immediately, reducing lanes and implementing curbs like they are doing on Commonwealth Avenue near Boston University on our wide streets such as Summer Street in South Boston and Melnea Cass Blvd would lead to more dedicated, complete, off street networks. |
Michael Flaherty |
A defining feature of the Vision Zero strategy in the City of Boston is the Neighborhood Slow Streets Program. Since its launch in 2017, the Neighborhood Slow Streets program is gradually extending into high traffic areas of the city. I have supported, and will continue to support, every neighborhood’s efforts to implement safety-oriented measures that enable and empower healthier communities. We also need to look at more long-term sustainable budget solutions so that Slow Streets programming opportunities are available on a more equal and equitable level in every neighborhood. Further, I am supportive of building a more robust data framework for Vision Zero updates so that residents can better track the progress of current projects. The creation of a comprehensive map of completed and ongoing projects with clear benchmarks to track progress through the “zero” goal year of 2030 would bring greater accountability and transparency to the process. |
The MBTA is one of the lifelines of our city; when it doesn’t work, our city doesn’t function properly. The recent derailments and technical difficulties served as a painful reminder of that. Our residents’ ability to go about their daily lives relies on a reliable public transit network. These minimum standards have not been met by the MBTA, and this fare hike creates an additional access barrier for commuters. Boston contributes $85.8 million to the local assessment revenues of the MBTA — more than half of the total local assessment revenues collected annually, and yet our residents are not being sufficiently served. |
I will continue to advocate for these important transit solutions on the City Council, particularly in the budget process, as I have done in the past. During this past budget season, I supported and voted for an increase in the capital budget for the Strategic Bike Network from $1.25 million to $4 million and increase Vision Zero funding from $3.9 million to $12 million. |
David Halbert |
As a member of the Council I will seek to see the body's Post Audit and Oversight Committee reconstituted and as to serve as Chair. I believe that the mandate of this committee, to review government operations and expenditures, is germane to the goal of seeking safer streets as it allows for precise and specific inquiry into what efforts the City has taken to achieve this goal and what the overall efficacy of those efforts has been. The information gathered by this type of inquiry can serve as a concrete building block for future proposals and performance review. In addition I would make the goal of traffic-calmed streets a key component of any and all discussions with the city's transportation department. This would include conversations during the annual budgeting process - and would also be informed by the data from the Post Audit hearings in the 2nd year of the term and moving forward. |
I will work with my fellow Councilors and the Mayor to promote all city-based efforts to increase public transit access and use. This would include streetscape and roadway redesign where appropriate; creating the necessary infrastructure to support bus rapid transit; and seeking to have Boston's voice reflected directly in MBTA leadership conversations, either via a city specific seat on the Board or through robust participation in a Community Advisory Committee similar to what exists with MassPort. I would also seek to work in as close a collaborative fashion as possible with Boston's state legislative delegation, since so many conversations around public transit - particularly funding - are decided at the state level. In order for Boston to achieve its full public transit potential it is critical that City Hall and the State House work together. |
In order to reach this goal I will first work with advocates to engage residents at the local level to determine what connections will work best for their respective neighborhoods. As the contours and impacts on different parts of the city will be felt in very different ways. As this information is being compiled I will work with the necessary stakeholders in city government to determine how to most effectively and efficiently implement the findings once they are concluded - with realistic timetables set for accelerated establishment of this network determined and agreed to from the outset. I will also use my position and public profile to bring attention to the plan, via media and in communities, so that the general public becomes allies in maintaining the necessary pressure to keep the plan on track and accountable. |
Julia Mejia |
To help ensure our roads/crosswalks are safe and inclusive, I will be a strong advocate for continuing initiatives to convert and maintain raised curbs on intersections accessible to disabled folks. I will also work to increase the time allotted to pedestrian crossing on our intersections so that folks of all mobilities don’t have to worry about getting hit or holding up traffic. I will review the default speed limit of 25MPH and see if it can be lowered to 20MPH or lower in high fatality/pedestrian heavy corridors to further protect the people of Boston. Where street diets can be implemented, I will work with neighborhoods to help implement them. Because of the city’s history, the foundation for pedestrian first transit planning is there; we just need to ensure that we are being mindful about are implementation and oversight in achieving these goals. |
We need to make it a system that gets all the people of Boston to where they need to go, not just one that likes to literally fly off the rails (and/or set itself on fire). I will work with and lobby the MBTA to expand the T into neighborhoods that don’t readily have access and fight for a free T for all to expand usage. I will activate local leaders and activists to provide oversight and advocate for their community. On the city level, I will work to further implement sustainable, people oriented transit infrastructure such as bus only lanes and median-protected bike lanes. I will be intentional about this rollout, targeting socioeconomically marginalized areas so that the benefits from expanding multi-modal transit will help build the foundation for an equitable and inclusive Boston. I will work with the PILOT working group to work to generate more revenue for the city to use to fund these efforts. |
I will look to cities that have implemented this successful and work with organizations and community groups that are already working with the city to implement these plans. I will work with the Mayor to expand efforts to create street diets in neighborhoods across the city working specifically to ensure that our neighborhoods that are primarily communities of color are not left behind. Too often the city has prioritized street safety in predominately white neighborhoods. Ensuring a racial equity lens is applied to street safety and bike safety will be a central part of my approach. |
Erin Murphy |
Work with BPD and Mass State Police to enforce speed limits. Explore making some two-way streets into one-ways as is being implemented in South Boston. |
A City Council seat on the MBTA Oversight Board to ensure Boston has meaningful input into the reformation of the T |
I am working with Greater Ashmont to develop and build the Dot Greenway project which will transform the Red Line tunnel cap in Dorchester into bike and pedestrian paths. There are several similar initiatives around the City I look forward to supporting. |
Alejandra St.Guillen |
In order to slow traffic on our streets, we need to make greater investments in Vision Zero. In comparison to other major cities, Boston invests a relatively small amount per person to implement the changes we need to make our streets safer. I would advocate for the bike lanes across the city, including expanding dedicated lanes across high demand transit corridors in the city that are wide enough for bikes. I also support the expansion of the Neighborhood Slow Streets program to make whole neighborhoods safer for children, seniors, walkers, and bikers. I also believe that there needs to be a public outreach campaign that targets multilingual communities in multiple languages and people with physical, auditory, or visual disabilities across various mediums educating the public about the importance of becoming a safer, more walkable and bikeable city. Also, there are certain mobility safety issues more prevalent in some neighborhoods and this ad campaign should micro target those specific areas. Lastly, I would also promote the open space, arts, and place-making by working with city agencies and local residents to support weekend street closures. |
My top priorities for advancing public transit in Boston, especially in transit dependent communities like Mattapan, Roxbury, East Boston, and high demand transit corridors like Washington Street, Blue Hill Drive, or Centre St will be working with advocates and city/state agencies to upgrade core transportation assets across the city and reinvesting in neglected transportation links, some of these improvements include: |
In order to reach the goals of Vision Zero, we must commitment to installing and maintaining bike and pedestrian infrastructure (sidewalks, lanes, crosswalks, etc) to promote safety and mutli-modal mobility. Capital investment will be key to being able to fast-track implementation of a city-wide network of off-street paths and protected bike lanes. I support raising revenue to meet these investments. We need to partner with our State colleagues on areas that are covered by the State jurisdiction and advocate for more funding to implement these networks. The city should report progress on a quarterly basis with the ambitious goals set forth. |
Michelle Wu |
I have been a strong supporter of Vision Zero, which is a proven strategy for improving traffic safety and saving lives. Boston's Neighborhood Slow Streets program, the Vision Zero residential traffic calming program, should be expanded and implemented with greater urgency. We have seen an outpouring of support and concern from residents across the city who want to change their streets to decrease speeding and reckless driving, but the program has not kept up with need. All residents deserve to benefit from this program, and I will continue to fight for funding and staff resources to implement this vision. We also need to fast-track our priority corridor redesigns and finish the job on vital corridors such as Mass Ave. Several years ago, protected bike lanes and pedestrian improvements were installed along this roadway in Back Bay and part of the South End, leaving out the section that connects to Dorchester. I support the Boston Cyclists Union’s campaign along this corridor and would like to see similar improvements expanded, with project timelines centered around a one-year planning and implementation cycle. |
The most impactful, fastest, and most cost effective way to dramatically improve public transit in Boston is for city government to focus on bus service. Dedicated bus lanes have been proven to speed up bus, shorten commute times, and increase ridership. This past term, I supported the implementation of the Washington Street bus lane in Roslindale and advocated for the creation of the City’s new Transit Team to oversee transit priority in Boston along with the MBTA. I continue to fight for these efforts to be accelerated as quickly as possible. We need to fund more BTD planning outreach positions to deepen engagement and expand our scale. I will continue connecting riders and colleagues to work collaboratively on tackling transit service inequities. We also need to lower the barriers that fares impose by moving toward fare-free transit, starting by removing barriers for our most underserved riders through a discounted fare for low-income residents. To finance these policies and to improve transit on our streets, I will push for measures to limit congestion on our streets, especially near environmental justice communities, as a matter of transit equity and public health. |
Creating networks of protected bike lanes and off-street paths are critical for expanding cycling access to people of all ages and backgrounds. One of our current hurdles is the lengthy timeline needed to plan and implement street redesign. We can fast-track projects by implementing improvements with simple, temporary materials like paint, signs, and flexposts through on-going maintenance work. Every street repaving project should be an opportunity to implement a Better Bike corridor. The same goes for bus-only lanes and tactical medians, or curb bump-outs for pedestrian safety. By leveraging ongoing work, we can build our way toward a more connected, sustainable transportation network in a smart, cost-effective manner. Once these improvements are in place, we can collect feedback and data, allowing us to tweak the design before making improvements permanent. I will continue to advocate for greater collaboration between the Public Works Department and the Transportation Department. Finally, we need to apply a network-based approach to our bike planning. Newly constructed protected infrastructure shouldn't just direct cyclists toward an unsafe street without bike infrastructure. |
Additional Questions
Click on the categories below for the complete question asked. Click on any answer with a * for further explanation of the candidate's stance.
Do you support: |
1. Vision Zero 1. Vision Zero is an approach which aims to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries and has been adopted by Boston, Cambridge, and Somerville, and many other cities across the country. Do you support the principles of Vision Zero policies and funding for their rapid implementation? click outside popup to close |
2. State law allowing automated enforcement 2. One key strategy that has been proven to effectively reduce speeding, improve safety, and remove racial bias in traffic enforcement in other states and countries is automated enforcement (i.e. speed cameras and red light cameras). Do you support S.1376, An Act relative to automated enforcement, which if passed would authorize cities and towns in Massachusetts to opt into the use of automated enforcement? To see the full text of the bill, visit malegislature.gov/Bills/191/S1376 click outside popup to close |
3. Bike Network Plan 3. Do you support the implementation of improved bike facilities identified in your community’s Bike Network Plan or do you support the creation of a Bike Network Plan if none already exists? click outside popup to close |
4. Age-friendly walking conditions 4. Do you support creating age-friendly walking conditions in your community -- an issue raised by many seniors as critical to their ability to 'age in community'? If yes, how? click outside popup to close |
(more below) |
Annissa Essaibi-George |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Oppose* Annissa Essaibi-GeorgeNo. I think that the presence of Police Officers on our streets and in our communities makes our City safer. I also have concerns about how traffic cameras impact the privacy rights of Bostonians. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
|
Michael Flaherty |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyI have long been an advocate for increased police presence on our roads and more traffic enforcement due to safety concerns I regularly hear from my constituents. Unfortunately, there is not enough manpower in each police district to sufficiently police all the roads on top of their other duties. As a result, I support these camera policies for the sake of driver, cyclist and pedestrian safety. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyI have consistently led efforts to repair damaged sidewalks, especially in cases where tree roots have uprooted the sidewalk creating a dangerous hazard for seniors and the disabled. I also regularly process requests from constituents on faded crosswalks and signs that are in disrepair and have become a safety hazard. I also support addressing the issue of signal timing, which is insufficient for many residents. click outside popup to close |
|
David Halbert |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* David HalbertWhile I am in support of the general goals and utility of automated enforcement tools for traffic management purposes I need to see more concrete proposals for the use of such data by law enforcement in non-traffic related contexts. Additionally I have concerns about particular neighborhoods and communities being noticeably more observed and impacted via higher levels of deployment of such technologies in their areas. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* David HalbertAs previously stated I believe that it is critical to provide amenities in neighborhoods that allow access without necessitating use of a car. As such, when looking at decisions on zoning, licensing, and other areas of community design this must be taken into account as a significant criteria for review. We must also factor in access for seniors, particularly those facing mobility challenges, when looking at streetscape design elements and changes. click outside popup to close |
|
Julia Mejia |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Julia MejiaI plan to work with the Department of Transportation specifically to prioritize lengthening the time allocated for crosswalks and where possible implementing street diets that create medians where pedestrians can safely wait to cross our bigger streets. click outside popup to close |
|
Erin Murphy |
Somewhat Support |
Strongly Support |
Somewhat Support |
Strongly Support* Erin MurphyBetter enforcement of snow clearance on sidewalks, better maintenance of walkways and sidewalks in neighborhoods, more benches and places for seniors to rest during neighborhood walks. click outside popup to close |
|
Alejandra St.Guillen |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Alejandra St.GuillenSidewalk improvements, increased signage at all crosswalks, curb cut maintenance and improvement click outside popup to close |
|
Michelle Wu |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuI see Vision Zero as an effort to improve the everyday lives of our seniors, who may be especially vulnerable to road conditions that encourage speeding cars. I support the efforts of WalkBoston and neighborhood affiliates to conduct walk audits with community members, and the City should work closely to implement these necessary changes. click outside popup to close |
Do you support: |
5. Restriction of parking for bus-only lanes 5. Do you support the restriction of on-street parking during rush hour in order to create dedicated bus lanes on certain major thoroughfares where bus riders experience significant delays due to traffic congestion? click outside popup to close |
6. New revenue sources 6. Do you support exploring new ways of raising revenue to provide Boston with more tools to improve conditions for people walking, using mobility assistive devices, biking, and using public transit (e.g. increasing the gas tax, implementing congestion pricing, increasing fees on Uber/Lyft)? If yes, please give examples that interest you. click outside popup to close |
7. Dynamic parking meter pricing 7. Do you support the rollout of dynamic parking meter pricing in business districts, which would increase meter rates during periods of increased demand, to free up on-street parking and reduce cars "cruising" for open spaces? click outside popup to close |
8. Traffic signal timing that prioritizes people walking 8. Boston has many traffic signals that do not work well for pedestrians. Do you support making signal timing safer, easier, and more convenient for people walking and using mobility assistive devices at all paces? click outside popup to close |
(more below) |
Annissa Essaibi-George |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Annissa Essaibi-GeorgeBoston and Massachusetts as a whole are in a transportation crisis. Despite recent efforts to increase access to transit through non-motor vehicle means, there are still staggering deficits that need to be addressed immediately. I have always supported raising the gas tax with revenue going directly to transit-related investments. I support charging a fee for more than one parking permit per household with revenue being earmarked for similar projects, and I strongly support increasing fees on TNCs. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Annissa Essaibi-GeorgeI support dynamic parking meter pricing in our downtown business districts where this problem is most prevalent (Financial District, Seaport, LMA, Fenway, Back Bay, Beacon Hill). In most outer neighborhood business districts, I would want to ensure that such a policy would pricing would not hurt small businesses if a problem does not exist. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
|
Michael Flaherty |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyI support this policy in areas where residents and businesses would not be adversely impacted. I would like to see a detailed transportation study on which roads this policy makes sense for around the city. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyI support increased fees on TNCs, along with making sure we are appropriately taxing shared mobility devices like electric scooters as we build out the regulations on those devices. We need to make sure users of both these transit methods are paying their fare share for their use of the roads. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyParking downtown is already a financial burden on city residents, with garage fees that working people, who may not be able to use the T for varying reasons, cannot afford. I am concerned that increasing meter fees during high demand times will increase the handicap placard abuse that is already happening throughout our City, as put forth by a 2016 Inspector General Report. A recommendation of this report was to create a two-tier system that would grant the handicapped meter-fee exemption to placard holders who are physically unable to reach a parking kiosk or insert coins into a meter. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
|
David Halbert |
Somewhat Support* David HalbertI believe that dedicated rush hour bus lanes, such as what has been implemented along Washington Street in Roslindale, can have a significant positive impact for those using mass transit and in encouraging others to switch to mass transit from personal vehicles. My concern is that, as this model seeks to be expanded, the city takes care to engage and provide parking options for those who otherwise would have their vehicles in those lanes - so that they may have the least disruption to their quality of life as possible. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* David Halbert"Collecting accurate and up-to-date property valuations on institutions subject to PILOT agreements, so that the direct financial contribution portion of the request is as robust and fair as possible. Congestion pricing, with a focus on how to hold harmless those at the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum who need to have access the the commercial core of the city for their livelihood and full civic participation. This would also necessitate more robust delivery of city services at the neighborhood level in order to protect against losses of equity and access. Increasing TNC fees." click outside popup to close |
Somewhat Support |
Strongly Support |
|
Julia Mejia |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Julia MejiaI will work with the PILOT working group, I support congestion pricing as well as dynamic metered pricing. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
|
Erin Murphy |
Somewhat Support* Erin MurphyUntil the MBTA provides consistently reliable to public transport to Boston residents, I hesitate to implement binding restrictions on commuters are at their wits ends trying to get to work and school on time. click outside popup to close |
Somewhat Oppose* Erin MurphyAgain, I believe public resources and elected officials should be focused on providing quality public transportation to citizens before we use measures like fines, ticketing, and tax increases (which are often perceived as punitive to regular citizens) to ease traffic and congestion and to decrease emissions. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
|
Alejandra St.Guillen |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Alejandra St.GuillenCongestion pricing; increasing fees on Uber/Lyft; charging for residential stickers click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
|
Michelle Wu |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuWe need multiple options to raise sustainable revenues at the scale needed for a transportation that serves all residents. Our policies should create the right incentives to use sustainable transportation by offering people high-quality infrastructure and charging users according to their impacts, including raising the gas tax and congestion pricing. I also support increasing fees for ride-hailing companies, including more funding to cities and towns overwhelmed by ride-sharing. Finally, cities and towns should be able to raise revenue directly through Regional Ballot Initiatives. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuI support better managing parking spaces by setting the right price. I also support Parking Benefits District, which would allow for investing the revenue from parking meters into communities locally, such as to our Main Streets districts for much-needed neighborhood improvements and projects. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
|
Do you support: |
9. Charging for residential parking permits 9. Do you support charging an annual fee for residential parking permits? click outside popup to close |
10. Reducing/ eliminating MBTA fares 10. Do you support reducing or eliminating MBTA fares for people with low income? click outside popup to close |
11. Ensuring large-scale developments are walkable, resilient, green, and connected 11. Do you support ensuring large-scale developments (including Sullivan Square, the Allston I-90 Interchange, and Suffolk Downs) incorporate the community's desire for walkability, connectivity, open space, and resiliency? click outside popup to close |
||
Annissa Essaibi-George |
Somewhat Support* Annissa Essaibi-GeorgeI strongly support charging a fee for more than one parking permit per household (excluding seniors, and residents living on fixed incomes and in poverty. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
||
Michael Flaherty |
Strongly Oppose* Michael FlahertyAt this time, I do not support charging for residential parking permits. I would like to see a complete audit done of existing spaces and their usage across the city before any policy is created and enacted. In many neighborhoods there is not enough parking and residents would be paying for a service that is therefore not available to them, making the policy inequitable. Further, the T is already too unreliable for Boston residents daily needs that it would be irresponsible to make the ownership of a car that residents need to go about their daily lives any more tedious or costly. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michael FlahertyI support my colleague Councilor Michelle Wu’s call that the T should be entirely free for all users, regardless of economic status, based on the outsized share of MBTA operating funds that Boston contributes and the overall environmental benefits of increased public transportation usage,. Not only will this will take more cars off the road and further reduce traffic congestion to alleviate bus delays, it has the added benefit of reducing our city’s carbon footprint to help preserve the environment for our children. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
||
David Halbert |
Somewhat Support* David HalbertI support the overall goal of this proposal, reducing the amount of automobiles on Boston's streets. Initially the 1st vehicle registered to a discrete address should not be charged a fee. After that a permit fee for other vehicles is reasonable. For those who work outside of Boston, in areas where public transit is severely limited or functionally not an option, an automobile is often an unfortunate economic necessity. As a matter of fairness and equity, and where the proposed fee on 1st vehicles is so low, this would allow more residents to grow to accept and embrace the idea of fees for all click outside popup to close |
Somewhat Support* David HalbertReducing or eliminating MBTA fares for low-income riders is a significant step towards greater access and utilization of public transit. It could also significantly help with traffic and parking related issues in Boston. While I am in full support of these goals I also want to ensure that there are identified, and ideally dedicated, funding streams to offset the loss of revenue by the T. This becomes even more critical in this type of proposal as ridership would be expected to increase and further tax the operational capacity of the system. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
||
Julia Mejia |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
||
Erin Murphy |
Somewhat Oppose* Erin MurphyIt depends. Residents who live in the most dense neighborhoods often oppose resident parking schemes because it makes caring for the elderly and receiving family visitors more difficult. Any increase in residential parking fees and/or expansion of the program needs to be done in concert with neighborhood preferences and priorities. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Oppose* Erin MurphyPublic transportation should be affordable for everyone. Seniors and BPS students should receive discounts, but otherwise, all riders of the MBTA should shoulder an equitable burden in terms of fares. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support |
||
Alejandra St.Guillen |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
Strongly Support |
||
Michelle Wu |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuDuring this term on the Council, I held a hearing on better managing residential parking permits and introduced an ordinance proposing an annual residential parking permit fee of $25 for the first vehicle in a household, $50 for the second, etc., with exemptions for low-income residents, seniors, and public school and health care staff who need to travel to visit students or patients. Managing this parking would also allow us more flexibility to address residents' needs--my ordinance also proposed to create a visitor parking pass program. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuI believe we need to Free the T for all, and that starts by lowering the barriers to those who depend on this service most. The MBTA’s fare hikes are regressive and impact low-income riders most. I have testified multiple times before the MBTA’s governing board in support of a low-income fare and will continue to do so. Based on the conclusions of a recent MIT study, which found that participants with a reduced fare made more trips by transit to medical services, such a program could be administered statewide through MassHealth. click outside popup to close |
Strongly Support* Michelle WuWith some of these larger projects, we need to ensure we are making the necessary investments in public transit to influence how people travel to these areas. In Allston, we need to make sure that West Station is built now, as an interim mitigation measure during the I-90 reconstruction process. click outside popup to close |
About the Candidate
Policy Proposals
Additional Questions
No. I think that the presence of Police Officers on our streets and in our communities makes our City safer. I also have concerns about how traffic cameras impact the privacy rights of Bostonians.
I have long been an advocate for increased police presence on our roads and more traffic enforcement due to safety concerns I regularly hear from my constituents. Unfortunately, there is not enough manpower in each police district to sufficiently police all the roads on top of their other duties. As a result, I support these camera policies for the sake of driver, cyclist and pedestrian safety.
While I am in support of the general goals and utility of automated enforcement tools for traffic management purposes I need to see more concrete proposals for the use of such data by law enforcement in non-traffic related contexts. Additionally I have concerns about particular neighborhoods and communities being noticeably more observed and impacted via higher levels of deployment of such technologies in their areas.
We need to reconsider our enforcement strategies when it comes to traffic violations and ensure equitable implementation to make our streets safer for all in the long-term. We should consider measures where people issued violations can opt for traffic safety classes in place of a fine, so that we're educating and encouraging a culture of safety and mutual respect on our roadways rather than adopting a purely punitive approach. I would also like to address surveillance and privacy concerns, with strong policies to protect civil liberties.
I have consistently led efforts to repair damaged sidewalks, especially in cases where tree roots have uprooted the sidewalk creating a dangerous hazard for seniors and the disabled. I also regularly process requests from constituents on faded crosswalks and signs that are in disrepair and have become a safety hazard. I also support addressing the issue of signal timing, which is insufficient for many residents.
In areas of the city with high concentration of seniors, crosswalk lights should have additional time added to allow seniors to cross the streets and there should be sidewalk ramps for residents who use a wheelchair. Boston's aging population deserves to be heard on the issues that most impact their life and will help them to remain in the neighborhoods and communities they've built.
I plan to work with the Department of Transportation specifically to prioritize lengthening the time allocated for crosswalks and where possible implementing street diets that create medians where pedestrians can safely wait to cross our bigger streets.
Better enforcement of snow clearance on sidewalks, better maintenance of walkways and sidewalks in neighborhoods, more benches and places for seniors to rest during neighborhood walks.
Sidewalk improvements, increased signage at all crosswalks, curb cut maintenance and improvement
I see Vision Zero as an effort to improve the everyday lives of our seniors, who may be especially vulnerable to road conditions that encourage speeding cars. I support the efforts of WalkBoston and neighborhood affiliates to conduct walk audits with community members, and the City should work closely to implement these necessary changes.
I support this policy in areas where residents and businesses would not be adversely impacted. I would like to see a detailed transportation study on which roads this policy makes sense for around the city.
I believe that dedicated rush hour bus lanes, such as what has been implemented along Washington Street in Roslindale, can have a significant positive impact for those using mass transit and in encouraging others to switch to mass transit from personal vehicles. My concern is that, as this model seeks to be expanded, the city takes care to engage and provide parking options for those who otherwise would have their vehicles in those lanes - so that they may have the least disruption to their quality of life as possible.
Until the MBTA provides consistently reliable to public transport to Boston residents, I hesitate to implement binding restrictions on commuters are at their wits ends trying to get to work and school on time.
Boston and Massachusetts as a whole are in a transportation crisis. Despite recent efforts to increase access to transit through non-motor vehicle means, there are still staggering deficits that need to be addressed immediately. I have always supported raising the gas tax with revenue going directly to transit-related investments. I support charging a fee for more than one parking permit per household with revenue being earmarked for similar projects, and I strongly support increasing fees on TNCs.
I support increased fees on TNCs, along with making sure we are appropriately taxing shared mobility devices like electric scooters as we build out the regulations on those devices. We need to make sure users of both these transit methods are paying their fare share for their use of the roads.
"Collecting accurate and up-to-date property valuations on institutions subject to PILOT agreements, so that the direct financial contribution portion of the request is as robust and fair as possible. Congestion pricing, with a focus on how to hold harmless those at the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum who need to have access the the commercial core of the city for their livelihood and full civic participation. This would also necessitate more robust delivery of city services at the neighborhood level in order to protect against losses of equity and access. Increasing TNC fees."
I will work with the PILOT working group, I support congestion pricing as well as dynamic metered pricing.
Again, I believe public resources and elected officials should be focused on providing quality public transportation to citizens before we use measures like fines, ticketing, and tax increases (which are often perceived as punitive to regular citizens) to ease traffic and congestion and to decrease emissions.
Congestion pricing; increasing fees on Uber/Lyft; charging for residential stickers
We need multiple options to raise sustainable revenues at the scale needed for a transportation that serves all residents. Our policies should create the right incentives to use sustainable transportation by offering people high-quality infrastructure and charging users according to their impacts, including raising the gas tax and congestion pricing. I also support increasing fees for ride-hailing companies, including more funding to cities and towns overwhelmed by ride-sharing. Finally, cities and towns should be able to raise revenue directly through Regional Ballot Initiatives.
I support dynamic parking meter pricing in our downtown business districts where this problem is most prevalent (Financial District, Seaport, LMA, Fenway, Back Bay, Beacon Hill). In most outer neighborhood business districts, I would want to ensure that such a policy would pricing would not hurt small businesses if a problem does not exist.
Parking downtown is already a financial burden on city residents, with garage fees that working people, who may not be able to use the T for varying reasons, cannot afford. I am concerned that increasing meter fees during high demand times will increase the handicap placard abuse that is already happening throughout our City, as put forth by a 2016 Inspector General Report. A recommendation of this report was to create a two-tier system that would grant the handicapped meter-fee exemption to placard holders who are physically unable to reach a parking kiosk or insert coins into a meter.
I support better managing parking spaces by setting the right price. I also support Parking Benefits District, which would allow for investing the revenue from parking meters into communities locally, such as to our Main Streets districts for much-needed neighborhood improvements and projects.
I strongly support charging a fee for more than one parking permit per household (excluding seniors, and residents living on fixed incomes and in poverty.
At this time, I do not support charging for residential parking permits. I would like to see a complete audit done of existing spaces and their usage across the city before any policy is created and enacted. In many neighborhoods there is not enough parking and residents would be paying for a service that is therefore not available to them, making the policy inequitable. Further, the T is already too unreliable for Boston residents daily needs that it would be irresponsible to make the ownership of a car that residents need to go about their daily lives any more tedious or costly.
I support the overall goal of this proposal, reducing the amount of automobiles on Boston's streets. Initially the 1st vehicle registered to a discrete address should not be charged a fee. After that a permit fee for other vehicles is reasonable. For those who work outside of Boston, in areas where public transit is severely limited or functionally not an option, an automobile is often an unfortunate economic necessity. As a matter of fairness and equity, and where the proposed fee on 1st vehicles is so low, this would allow more residents to grow to accept and embrace the idea of fees for all
It depends. Residents who live in the most dense neighborhoods often oppose resident parking schemes because it makes caring for the elderly and receiving family visitors more difficult. Any increase in residential parking fees and/or expansion of the program needs to be done in concert with neighborhood preferences and priorities.
During this term on the Council, I held a hearing on better managing residential parking permits and introduced an ordinance proposing an annual residential parking permit fee of $25 for the first vehicle in a household, $50 for the second, etc., with exemptions for low-income residents, seniors, and public school and health care staff who need to travel to visit students or patients. Managing this parking would also allow us more flexibility to address residents' needs--my ordinance also proposed to create a visitor parking pass program.
I support my colleague Councilor Michelle Wu’s call that the T should be entirely free for all users, regardless of economic status, based on the outsized share of MBTA operating funds that Boston contributes and the overall environmental benefits of increased public transportation usage,. Not only will this will take more cars off the road and further reduce traffic congestion to alleviate bus delays, it has the added benefit of reducing our city’s carbon footprint to help preserve the environment for our children.
Reducing or eliminating MBTA fares for low-income riders is a significant step towards greater access and utilization of public transit. It could also significantly help with traffic and parking related issues in Boston. While I am in full support of these goals I also want to ensure that there are identified, and ideally dedicated, funding streams to offset the loss of revenue by the T. This becomes even more critical in this type of proposal as ridership would be expected to increase and further tax the operational capacity of the system.
Public transportation should be affordable for everyone. Seniors and BPS students should receive discounts, but otherwise, all riders of the MBTA should shoulder an equitable burden in terms of fares.
I believe we need to Free the T for all, and that starts by lowering the barriers to those who depend on this service most. The MBTA’s fare hikes are regressive and impact low-income riders most. I have testified multiple times before the MBTA’s governing board in support of a low-income fare and will continue to do so. Based on the conclusions of a recent MIT study, which found that participants with a reduced fare made more trips by transit to medical services, such a program could be administered statewide through MassHealth.
With some of these larger projects, we need to ensure we are making the necessary investments in public transit to influence how people travel to these areas. In Allston, we need to make sure that West Station is built now, as an interim mitigation measure during the I-90 reconstruction process.