2021 Boston District Six Election

Jump to:

Housing, Transportation, and Climate

Mobility/Housing Story

Policy Proposals

Additional Questions

Candidates proceeding to the municipal election on November 2nd are indicated with

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke
pdf of answers

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks †
pdf of answers

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer †
pdf of answers

 

Click on a question to read each candidate's answer.

Housing, Transportation, and Climate

Transportation, housing, and climate issues are currently siloed in City Hall. How do you see these issues connecting and how will you work to align them if elected?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

No answer

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

Our policy platform is both visionary and pragmatic. It creates racially equitable solutions that benefit us all by focusing on systems change and nurturing a more participatory democracy. It calls on us to remember what’s at stake—the well-being of our children, our families, our neighbors, and our descendants. We need to do the work today for a better tomorrow.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

All three are tied to our environment, as well as public health, equity, & justice. And at a time of housing scarcity in Boston, we must prioritize transit-oriented development which will reduce reliance on cars, create more affordable units, and allow for greater density. We must push for collaboration among the city’s Department of Neighborhood Development, the Environment Department, the BPDA, & the MBTA. Expanding access to quality & predictable public transit options, including fare-free buses, bus rapid transit, & accessible pedestrian & cycling infrastructure, is also a top priority.

Top

 

What is your mobility/housing story?

1a. Which of the following modes of transportation do you use regularly in Boston? (Check the top 3.)

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

✓ Car

✓ Subway

Commuter rail

✓ Bus

Bike (bike-share or personal bicycle)

Mobility device

Walking

Rideshare

Moped/motorcycle

Scooter

Carpool

Other

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

✓ Car

✓ Subway

Commuter rail

Bus

Bike (bike-share or personal bicycle)

Mobility device

✓ Walking

Rideshare

Moped/motorcycle

Scooter

Carpool

Other

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

✓ Car

Subway

Commuter rail

Bus

Bike (bike-share or personal bicycle)

Mobility device

✓ Walking

Rideshare

Moped/motorcycle

Scooter

✓ Carpool

Other

1b. What types of housing have you lived in or owned throughout your life? (Check all that apply.)

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

Duplex/Triple-decker

4-to-6-unit building

✓ Over-six-unit apartment building

As a renter

As a landlord

Home ownership

Housing insecure

✓ Single-family home

Public housing / Section 8

Deed-restricted affordable

Urban

Suburban

Rural

Other

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

✓ Duplex/Triple-decker

4-to-6-unit building

✓ Over-six-unit apartment building

✓ As a renter

As a landlord

Home ownership

✓ Housing insecure

Single-family home

✓ Public housing / Section 8

✓ Deed-restricted affordable

✓ Urban

Suburban

Rural

Other

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

✓ Duplex/Triple-decker

✓ 4-to-6-unit building

✓ Over-six-unit apartment building

✓ As a renter

As a landlord

✓ Home ownership

Housing insecure

✓ Single-family home

Public housing / Section 8

Deed-restricted affordable

✓ Urban

Suburban

Rural

Other

Top

 

Policy Proposals

1. While the MBTA controls bus service, the City of Boston controls the streets the buses operate on. How would you accelerate bus service and bus priority infrastructure?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

Bus riders want bus reliability, get to destination on time, and be comfortable in a bus . Bus services must consider the ridership and population in each route. The availability of buses should match the ridership, with slow and peak periods. City should have bus lanes on busy streets, maintain routes to avoid damages to buses due to pot holes etc. In essence the city should have a dedicated budget for route maintenance. Maintenance of the fleet must be a priority as well as replacing old buses. Designation of bus routes and stops should be managed by an advisory panel of citizens, not politicians. Bus services should be automated and should consider rapid lines like those in LA as well as its own signal. We should consider moving from long routes to shorter routes to lower the rates of transfer and cut down on frequent stops that slow buses. Cash payment should be discouraged to reduce vault management and maintenance. Finally, clean buses increase ridership as well as good customer service.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

I believe the city of Boston can and should implement a complete streets model. When implemented well, complete streets are each unique and respond well to that particular community’s context. In addition to sidewalks and bike lanes (or wide paved shoulders), complete streets may have special bus lanes, comfortable and accessible public transportation stops, frequent and safe crosswalks, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, narrower travel lanes, and roundabouts. Creating complete streets helps make cities and communities more livable, improves health, safety, public health, and cuts transportation costs. As a city councilor, I will be a champion for infrastructure that considers a complete streets model so that all our neighbors can move freely around the city in safe, accessible, and effective ways.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

It is a top priority of mine to expand access to quality and predictable public transit options, including fare-free buses, bus rapid transit, and safe and accessible pedestrian and cycling infrastructure. While the Boston City Council doesn’t have direct jurisdiction over public transit, Boston elected officials can use the bully pulpit and the organizing power of the office to advocate for changing the current transit system. This includes the fact that the City of Boston controls the streets the buses operate on.
We must begin by removing fares on MBTA buses as a pilot program and then explore further expansion. By utilizing bus rapid transit and better connecting cycling infrastructure, we can make intra-neighborhood transportation safer and easier. To truly reduce dependence on cars, we must give residents access to a clean, safe, and predictable public transit system, especially our MBTA trains, buses, and commuter rail. I’d like to see our MBTA buses as well as our Boston school buses move away from diesel fuel (which causes a multitude of health issues) toward a reasonable timeline for an electric fleet.

2. The MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) makes important decisions regarding MBTA service, projects, and programs. The FMCB is sunsetting in July and the MBTA will be without a dedicated governance board. Will you advocate for a new governance board and a seat on it for the City of Boston, and how?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

I will advocate for new governing board. I am happy to note that the legislature is moving toward that. Since Boston is one of the contributing cities and the largest, it should have a seat on the new Board. I will suggest that the mayor and or city council nominate three names for the mayor's approval

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

Yes. In addition to advocating for a new governance board, I will work to ensure that the decision-making body is representative of the communities that most benefit from public transit and are impacted by the decisions being made.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

Yes, I will advocate for a new governance board, and I will specifically advocate for the City of Boston to have a seat on it. The "how" is by organizing, and I would work with constituents in District 6, my fellow Boston City Councilors, as well as members of the Boston delegation serving at the State House to collectively advocate for this representative seat for Boston. As the largest municipality in the state with a significant portion of residents reliant on public transportation, this representation is crucial to ensure the voices of commuters are heard and that their needs are met.

3. The City of Boston’s comprehensive transportation plan, Go Boston 2030, includes the implementation of 26 priority Better Bike Corridors and other bike projects. How will you ensure all short-term projects are implemented within three years, and long-term projects are implemented by or before 2030?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

There should be a time line for all projects and dedicated personnel for each or cluster of similar projects. Short-term projects like street safety team could work on street and traffic signs, road crossings, bike routes, speed lights, pedestrian ways. Long term projects will also need term line and on-point person. These include projects like transportation reliability, reducing car use, reducing emissions, and transportation affordability for low income households.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

Currently, about half of the projects on Go Boston 2030 are underway. I will be an advocate for the implementation of all short-term and long-term projects. As I referenced in a previous question, there is an opportunity to revise the plan in a way that engages stakeholders and all involved city government offices and this would be informed by that process as well.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

One of the most important roles of a City Councilor is holding the Administration accountable for the implementation of policy. As City Councilor, I will ensure that the City is providing the funding required to implement these projects according to schedule and the oversight to ensure this.
This would be part of my approach to the City’s annual budget process and I would also work closely with advocates and experts to gain an independent understanding of project status and efficacy of implementation.

4. Often street projects designed to improve safety involve removing on-street parking or reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes to make space for people walking and biking. How would you advance safety projects when there is active opposition to narrowing the roadway and removing parking?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

People are very passionate about their beliefs. However, using survey and data are the best way to focus all in the community, including opposition groups.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

If we want to house a changing city equitably, we need a housing plan based on our residents’ real needs. Half of all new construction should be designated for tenants and homeowners, making 60% AMI or below, reflecting Boston residents’ incomes. We will advocate for the funding we need and work to direct at least half of the housing funds from the recently passed increased linkage fees to housing for low-income residents with an income below 30% AMI. We will reduce land-use barriers by transforming zoning, deliver more permanent supportive and senior housing, include non-congregant shelter options, establish green standards for new housing, and expand City-funded rent subsidies, similar to Section 8.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

I have heard from residents all over District 6 about the need for safer streets, more outdoor spaces (whether for restaurants or community events), safe biking infrastructure, as well as issues around parking. Through the pandemic, so many of our local restaurants have embraced outdoor dining & would like to retain the spaces that were initially created as temporary measures. Whether we are considering new development, park renovations, or reimagining our streets, residents want transparency and a voice in these processes. To this end, I would advocate for a robust community process, similar to what Boston Parks and Recreation facilitates as part of their ongoing renovation of the city’s parks and green spaces. I have taken part in several of these meetings, which start with a facilitated listening process, followed by a presentation of themes and options (based on previously collected feedback from 1st meeting), then a survey where stakeholders can weigh in on the various options, and then a final presentation of the design that garnered the greatest amount of support (while also addressing the priorities identified via the community process). This is a positive model to follow.

5. Boston’s inclusionary development policy (IDP) program requires that new developments of 10 units or more include at least 13% of the new units be affordable and income-restricted. There is conversation about increasing the IDP percentage; however, experience and research around the country has shown that setting an IDP percentage too high can actually reduce the total number of new affordable units built. Would you support a new 12 unit building where 50% of the units are affordable over a 60 unit building where 20% of the units are affordable? Why?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

The city needs affordable units. I support increasing the IDP. However, i prefer that it is graduated to a 2% increase starting with present 13% to 15% a so that we encourage instead of discourage developers.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

If we want to house a changing city equitably, we need a housing plan based on our residents’ real needs. Half of all new construction should be designated for tenants and homeowners, making 60% AMI or below, reflecting Boston residents’ incomes. We will advocate for the funding we need and work to direct at least half of the housing funds from the recently passed increased linkage fees to housing for low-income residents with an income below 30% AMI. We will reduce land-use barriers by transforming zoning, deliver more permanent supportive and senior housing, include non-congregant shelter options, establish green standards for new housing, and expand City-funded rent subsidies, similar to Section 8.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

When it comes to housing, Boston’s challenge is two-fold: we have a scarcity of housing, and we have a scarcity of affordable housing. As I meet with more people across District 6, I have heard of a multitude of challenges faced by those who live in subsidized housing, as well as those who pay full-market rent or mortgages for condos or homes. In the scenario presented above, I would support a 60-unit building with 20% affordable units for two key reasons: first, it provides more needed units (of varying income levels) and second, it provides twice as many affordable units as the 12-unit proposal. Boston’s population has grown by nearly 13% since the 2010 census, and the need for affordable housing is profound. We must address the urgency of the need, and I fully support mixed-income housing models such as the recently approved proposal to renovate and expand the Mildred C. Hailey Apartments in Jamaica Plain -- and I was the only candidate in the District 6 race to testify in favor of this proposal (as supported by the existing residents) at the BPDA meeting prior to the board vote in April 2021.

6. Housing a Changing City: Boston 2030 determined that Boston needed 69,000 new homes by 2030. The last public update (Q4 2019) indicated that the city is likely behind schedule. The current lengthy permitting process in Boston is a well-known barrier to meeting this challenge. How would you reduce timelines and unnecessary costs to create more homes for people in neighborhoods across the city?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

First, determine the reason for the delays. If it is staff-based, plan and hire the required number of personnel to do the work. Faster times for permits will generate the revenue to offset the new hires and provide needed housing at the same time.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

We need our housing decision-making to better match the nature of our housing needs and to ensure racial, gender, and economic equity. More Black and Indigenous people, people of color, renters, women, lower-income and unhoused residents, seniors, and students should be represented in our housing decision-making bodies. I would support dedicated Housing Need Representation on the Zoning Board of Appeal and require representation in zoning hearings, Boston Planning and Development Agency meetings, and other deliberative sessions to empower and hear directly from people who would benefit from affordable housing.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

One of the greatest barriers to creating needed housing is a convoluted permitting process. The City must create processes that give all stakeholders -- residents, community development corporations, builders, organized labor, and other community-based organizations -- both predictability and transparency.
This has continued to be a challenge across all of our neighborhoods, and there are concrete steps I would take to streamline the process and to ensure proper staffing in place at Inspectional Services (ISD) for quicker turnaround times; for greater transparency in the permitting processes with clear guidelines on how to proceed; as well as the addition of permitting “troubleshooters’ available in-person and by phone for those seeking assistance.
The City must also encourage greater collaboration between entities to achieve housing goals that also meet pre-existing community needs.

7. What actions or policies that fall under existing municipal powers (i.e. do not require a home rule petition) do you support to help prevent displacement?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

I support all the policies. However, policies such as codifying conditions under which a landlord can evict tenants in foreclosed properties does not require a home rule petition. This could be part of a normal system on the city's website, Boston Housing Authority on what tenants should know. In addition, providing legal representation should also be part of an education series who renters in the city.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

The COVID-19 pandemic and economic crisis have compounded the threat of displacement for our neighbors. I will champion the passage of Article 91 of the City of Boston Zoning Code and establish anti-displacement overlays in high-risk neighborhoods, as an investment in a just recovery from the pandemic and an affirmation of the right to remain for Bostonian renters and homeowners. Anti-Displacement Zones will designate a new type of zoning district with unique standards and programs to give current residents a meaningful role in shaping their neighborhood’s future.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer
I support several key efforts that can be done with existing municipal powers to ease our housing shortage and promote affordability:
  1. Prioritize transit-oriented development so housing affordability can also provide a cleaner, more mobile, and less-congested Boston.
  2. Improve annual accountability for the affordable housing projects funded through the Inclusionary Development Policy Fund and Community Preservation Act (CPA) grants.
  3. End the buyout option in the city’s Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP).
  4. Expand city efforts (via grants) to support those facing hardship in paying rent and mortgages, and provide tax relief to seniors so they may remain in their homes and neighborhoods.
  5. Expand first-time home buyer programs and access to lending.
  6. We need an inventory on the location and status of available lots and underutilized buildings in the city’s roster. There is absolutely an opportunity to look at underutilized buildings (or lots) owned by the city that could be converted to affordable housing. For any of these buildings or available lots, housing should be a top priority if the site is deemed appropriate.
8. In a new housing development where space is limited, and parking adds substantially to the cost, how would you prioritize space/think about tradeoffs (between more units, parking, open space, etc.)? What would you do in the face of community opposition to developments that seek to balance these priorities?

Winnie Eke

Winnie Eke

Since the community is already focused on unit affordability. I will support getting more housing units and less parking as the parking negates the affordability of the units. Not having the parking spaces will be a way to encourage people to use other means of transportation, help the environment and improve health. With a few parking spaces, those who truly need them should pay except for handicap spaces.

Kendra Hicks

Kendra Hicks

One of my strengths is my experience and skill at bringing people together to solve complex problems across difference. I also am running for City Council because I believe we need leadership willing to make hard decisions that benefit the many even in the face of opposition.

Mary Tamer

Mary Tamer

All proposed development must prioritize an open and transparent community process with input from residents and community stakeholders. As City Councilor, it will be important to work closely with all parties involved to ensure that development projects are mutually beneficial and enhance the community at large. I look forward to bringing people together and facilitating honest and respectful dialogue that will result in the best possible result.
With any proposed development, I will advocate for open space, LEED certification, accessibility, and ability for community members to access housing. There is not a one-size-fits-all approach to the considerations mentioned above (more units, parking, etc.), because of the diversity of the district (density of proposed site, access to public transportation, as well as other factors).

Top

 

Additional Questions

Each candidate has chosen an answer among these options; click on any button with shadow (like the Somewhat Support button below) to read the candidate's additional explanation:

Strongly Support

Somewhat Support

candidate's explanation

Neither Support nor Oppose

Somewhat Oppose

Strongly Oppose

1. The Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition supports the removal of direct policing from Vision Zero goals, citing issues of safety and equity and a lack of effectiveness in improving safety. You can read about these issues in the Boston Vision Zero Progress Report and the Coalition Statement on Gov. Baker Administration’s Road Safety Legislation. Do you support removing police enforcement from Vision Zero?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Our communities are over-policed, and the policing budget keeps growing while we’re in the midst of a housing and climate crisis.

Mary Tamer

Neither Support nor Oppose

As City Councilor, I look forward to working with advocates and stakeholders to enact policy that is most effective in keeping residents safe. To that end, I would welcome conversations on the best path forward when it comes to the role of direct policing in street safety.

2. Police details are often required for construction projects and open streets events -- it would save money and create jobs if community members were allowed to do this work. Civilian flaggers were first authorized in 2008 to help fill these roles in Massachusetts; nevertheless, these projects and events are still primarily staffed by police on overtime, and detail requests often go unfilled entirely. Do you support reducing police involvement in streets-related projects and events?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

Using citizen flaggers will provide employment and reduce over time pay in city budgets.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

I committed to this early in my campaign and named it one of my six community safety priorities.

Mary Tamer

Neither Support nor Oppose

Based on reporting from WBUR and others, the civilian flagger program in MA has not led to great cost savings as hoped for, as the prevailing wage law mandates that flaggers are paid $40 per hour (on par with law enforcement). And Mass DOT cites a lack of available civilian flaggers for these roles.

3. One key strategy that has been proven to effectively reduce speeding, improve safety, and remove racial bias in traffic enforcement in other states and countries is automated enforcement (i.e. speed cameras and red light cameras). If the State House passes automated enforcement legislation that allows cities & towns to opt-in to a speed or red light camera program, would you support your municipality using this tool?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

This will remove targeting of black drivers, especially young black males from direct contact with police officers.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

We need to remove police interactions from minor traffic related issues.

Mary Tamer

Neither Support nor Oppose

I would want to learn more about the details of the proposed program, including how it would impact the civil liberties of residents, review case studies of other cities utilizing this technology, as well as look into issues around cost and implementation.

4. The Boston Transportation Department’s Neighborhood Slow Streets program has been very popular when implemented on smaller neighborhood-level streets, but many injuries from traffic crashes happen on busier arterial roads. Do you support traffic calming for high-crash intersections and roadways of arterials to prevent crashes and save lives, even when it means taking away parking or travel lanes?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

The city’s plan to redesign Centre Street in West Roxbury is sound and balances needs of business community and abutting neighborhoods while prioritizing pedestrian safety. I will work to move this plan forward and collaborate with residents to determine need for similar measures across district.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Without question, the safety of our city residents is a top priority & we must address roadways where we know frequent problems occur. As stated in an earlier question, we must bring residents together with the city's traffic department and other relevant agencies to determine the best path forward.

5. The Go Boston 2030 plan was released in 2017. Do you support updating the plan and working to advance the plan’s goals?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

I would support the reconvening of the aforementioned stakeholders and community members to have a conversation about the challenges of implementing the action plan in order to identify opportunities to accelerate implementation and challenges we can respond to.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Our city is changing rapidly, with a population growing at a significant pace. As a result, we must review all plans such as Go Boston 2030 on an annual basis, to ensure that the stated goals are in line with where we need to be & hold the city accountable on its efforts to mitigate climate change.

6. Mode shift occurs when people get out of their cars and choose other ways of getting around. Do you support the City’s Go Boston 2030 goal of reducing car trips by 50% by 2030?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Road designs that benefit the environment and work for walking, biking, driving, and using mobility devices make our neighborhoods more walkable will positively impact our local economy and air quality by increasing foot traffic and reducing carbon emissions from transportation.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

I fully support this goal, and we must ensure that the state does its part on addressing the myriad issues of our long neglected MBTA in order to get more drivers out of their cars and into public transportation, as well as on bikes or walking.

7. Do you support reassessing the plans and viability of major capital projects, such as the Northern Avenue Bridge or the Rutherford Avenue redesign?

Winnie Eke

Somewhat Support

It is understandable that there is an attachment to the bridge and what it represents. it also gives access to Rose Kennedy Greenway. However, if the bridge is not safe for use, then the project could continue or halted for other projects. However, the Rutherford Avenue redesign is warranted.

Kendra Hicks

Somewhat Support

The Northern Avenue Bridge project has been touted as a “people first” bridge. I believe this is a welcome shift from our usual centering of cars over people in our city streets. With that said, I know little about the process for both of these capital projects and welcome any guidance.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Yes, I support both of these projects and how they will be reimagined for future use. While neither project is in my district, they are both vital links to different parts of the city and will provide a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly environment while adding much needed green space.

8. How curb space is managed can impact many different city functions, including bus service, commercial delivery, and residential parking. When used effectively, curb space can speed up bus service with dedicated lanes, create safe biking infrastructure, and/or allow businesses to quickly and safely receive deliveries. Do you support conducting a city-wide parking study to evaluate how effectively curb space is being used?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

All planning should be done using concrete data and evidence rather than sentiments.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

A city-wide parking study is a logical way to determine the various uses of curb space and how those uses have changed over time.

9. Do you support charging an annual fee for residential parking permits?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Oppose

Home owners are already paying taxes etc.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Mary Tamer

Somewhat Oppose

I support charging a fee for more than two cars per household.

10. Do you support free bus service on the MBTA and a low-income fare option for other public transit options?

Winnie Eke

Somewhat Oppose

I support the low-income fare option for both public and MBTA and other public transit options. Free bus services will undermine the efficiency of MBTA and its services to the community.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

While the Boston City Council doesn’t have direct jurisdiction over this, I support free bus service as well as a low-income fare option for other transit. At a time when we need to entice people back to using public transportation, this is a tangible way to do it.

11. Boston has many traffic signals that do not work well for pedestrians. Do you support making signal timing safer and more convenient for people crossing at all speeds, including those walking and using mobility assistive devices?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

This will be helpful and prevent pedestrians from crossing due to a long wait.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

We need to work to ensure our streets are people centered and that includes signal timing and location.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Absolutely yes. This is an issue of accessibility and safety, and my policy platform is clear on my stance on these issues.

12. Do you support ensuring large-scale developments (including Sullivan Square, the Allston I-90 Interchange, and Suffolk Downs) incorporate the community's desire for walkability, connectivity, open space, and resilience?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

This will be a good way to increase community access to open spaces and recreation, give back to the community and improve stakeholders' responsibility in protecting and caring for their space.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

One of my commitments is experimenting with car free streets. Car-free districts allow micro-businesses to set up on sidewalks or in former parking spaces and become community spaces in neighborhoods where green space and other recreational facilities are scarce.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

All projects of this magnitude must incorporate community voice and feedback as they will impact the surrounding neighborhoods for years to come.

13. Do you support prioritizing and advancing the housing production goals outlined in the 2018 update to Housing a Changing City: Boston 2030?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

I support the inclusion of income-restricted housing as well as preserving existing neighborhood. I support the plans for increasing home ownership and preventing displacement. More funding should be allocated to housing families with children and school-age children.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Yes, with an increasing population which has grown 13% since the 2010 census, Boston must prioritize the need for housing for residents of all income levels, with a focus on affordable housing stock.

14. Lawsuits filed against two much needed, 100% affordable housing developments in Jamaica Plain have recently underscored how mandatory parking minimums can be weaponized within the legal system to significantly slow or prevent affordable housing. Do you support the proposal by Councilors Matt O’Malley and Kenzie Bok to update the zoning code to eliminate mandatory parking minimums for affordable housing?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

I support O'Malley and Bok's proposal to eliminate mandatory parking minimums. I support having more units, especially where there are public transportation to encourage residents to use public transit instead of increasing GHG using cars.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

As a renter in an affordable housing unit I understand the urgency of building more affordable housing in the district. I am in full support of the suggested changes to the zoning code and will ensure that there is continuity in this work as a city councilor.

Mary Tamer

Somewhat Support

I support the intent of this proposal, but I'm concerned that some developers might use this to the detriment of residents of affordable units. We have transportation deserts in Boston, including District 6, and seniors & residents unable to access public transit must be a consideration as well.

15. Given the affordability crisis, many are critical of the perceived large amount of new “luxury” construction and would like to see more moderately priced housing options being built. Yet, the city’s zoning code mandates strict parking minimums for any new housing development, and parking is expensive (a single structured parking space adds an average of $50,000 in per-unit costs). This substantial cost often pushes otherwise moderately priced new housing into the “luxury” price range. In order to increase the amount of moderately priced homes in the city, would you support reducing mandatory parking minimums for all new development city-wide?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

In a time when we are trying to decrease GHG and encourage walking or use of pubic transit, the mandatory minimums should be discouraged. Furthermore, luxury price range defeats the purpose of an inclusive and affordable housing and displacement in the city .

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

We need to work to decenter cars in Boston and I believe we need to work on income adjusted fees.

Mary Tamer

Somewhat Support

Certain sub-neighborhoods in Boston are public transportation deserts. Therefore, I think it is important to ensure each proposed development is done in a way that best meets the shared needs of each community.

16. The City of Boston has devoted significant resources and conducted extensive community processes to develop neighborhood-based plans (i.e. PLAN: JP/Rox, PLAN: South Boston Dorchester Ave). However, the city has failed to incorporate these plans into the zoning code, perpetuating a system of parcel-by-parcel discretion and diminishing public trust in the planning process. Do you support codifying these and future plans into the city’s zoning code within a reasonable time frame (six months of a plan’s release)?

Winnie Eke

Strongly Support

I strongly support codifying neighborhood based-plans within reasonable time frame. It is important to recognize that each section of the city has its own needs, instead of the use of parcel-by-parcel zoning.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

Boston continues to have a high number of projects requiring variances to move forward, due to outdated zoning codes that have not been updated in decades. Clearly the housing needs of today vary significantly from the needs of 10 or 20 years ago, and our zoning must reflect our changing city.

17. The City of Boston and Boston Housing Authority have recently launched a city project-based housing voucher program. Do you support continued funding for this program, and do you support expanding it to include additional funding and/or a mobile voucher program?

Winnie Eke

Somewhat Support

I support the proposed city housing voucher. This will help those are now not qualifies for Section 8 and other housing programs. I do not support a mobile voucher program attached to a housing voucher. These should be separate.

Kendra Hicks

Strongly Support

Yes - I've committed to this in my policy priorities.

Mary Tamer

Strongly Support

It is well known that we have great need in Boston for housing, and we must address our high displacement rate as a result of our rising housing costs. The city's economic growth is dependent on workers of all levels, and we must focus our efforts on providing vouchers to those in greatest need.

Top