2021 Boston District Three Election

Jump to:

Housing, Transportation, and Climate

Mobility/Housing Story

Policy Proposals

Additional Questions

no photo submitted

Frank Baker
(no answers submitted)

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride
pdf of answers

 

Click on a question to read the candidate's answer.

Housing, Transportation, and Climate

Transportation, housing, and climate issues are currently siloed in City Hall. How do you see these issues connecting and how will you work to align them if elected?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

If we are able to make significant investments and changes in these three areas, we will be able to tackle some of the most pressing issues facing our city. Each area, though important in its own right, is implicitly tied to the other and a change in one will impact how we perceive the other.
We should consider the environmental impacts of housing and transportation projects, how transportation projects might impact local housing, and how new developments would change demand for public transit. I will push for communication and collaboration between these departments.

Top

 

What is your mobility/housing story?

1a. Which of the following modes of transportation do you use regularly in Boston? (Check the top 3.)

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Car

Subway

Commuter rail

Bus

Bike (bike-share or personal bicycle)

Mobility device

Walking

Rideshare

Moped/motorcycle

Scooter

Carpool

Other

1b. What types of housing have you lived in or owned throughout your life? (Check all that apply.)

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Duplex/Triple-decker

4-to-6-unit building

Over-six-unit apartment building

As a renter

As a landlord

Home ownership

Housing insecure

Single-family home

Public housing / Section 8

Deed-restricted affordable

Urban

Suburban

Rural

Other

Top

 

Policy Proposals

1. While the MBTA controls bus service, the City of Boston controls the streets the buses operate on. How would you accelerate bus service and bus priority infrastructure?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

I would love to see more priority bus lanes across the city. As we increase the speed at which commuters can get across the city, we’ll reduce the need for folks to own their own vehicles. Black commuters in Boston spend, on average, 64 more hours per year on the bus than white riders. Any improvements we make to our buses more efficient will more positively impact these commuters and help make their commute times more equitable.
The City of Boston and the MBTA must work together to understand which routes suffer the most from traffic backups or inefficient routes and plan for a future where bus service is both predictable and reliable, for every community in Boston. Using data from existing GPS trackers, I would push them to work with the city to identify the most impacted routes and identify opportunities to speed up bus movement, such as dedicated lanes.
From more residents in the city owning cars to empty ride-share vehicles waiting for their next passenger, many of our streets have begun to see congestion for which they were not designed. We must begin to examine ways to reduce the need to own a car in Boston.

2. The MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) makes important decisions regarding MBTA service, projects, and programs. The FMCB is sunsetting in July and the MBTA will be without a dedicated governance board. Will you advocate for a new governance board and a seat on it for the City of Boston, and how?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

"Yes - Beacon Hill has legislation before it that would keep the FMCB in place and I support the spirit of the bills. I believe that we need an independent board that can ensure the future of the MBTA best serves the interests of all Bay Staters.
In line with the actions of Councilors Flynn and Bok, I would support and, where appropriate, draft resolutions to support amendments that would add 2 seats to the Board - one for Boston and one for surrounding communities. Senator Collins has filed Bill S.2279 which seeks to accomplish this. If legislation is adopted this year that does not expand the board to include Boston representation, I would continue to work with the Boston delegation on Beacon Hill to push for future adjustments to ensure that Boston has a dedicated voice on the Board. "

3. The City of Boston’s comprehensive transportation plan, Go Boston 2030, includes the implementation of 26 priority Better Bike Corridors and other bike projects. How will you ensure all short-term projects are implemented within three years, and long-term projects are implemented by or before 2030?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Oversight and accountability will be key to success here. We must make it easy for the public to understand which projects are planned or in progress and when we’ve committed to having them completed. If projects fall behind for any reason, we must be clear as to why and take any learnings to apply to future projects to either adjust the timeline or address the causes of delays.
As projects are completed, we should also highlight their successes to keep excitement high for the long-term projects. Ten years is a long time and we should be sure that we don’t lose the momentum that helped create the Go Boston 2030 plan.

4. Often street projects designed to improve safety involve removing on-street parking or reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes to make space for people walking and biking. How would you advance safety projects when there is active opposition to narrowing the roadway and removing parking?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Every project will have a variety of considerations that we must work to understand and balance. For those facing opposition, I would first seek to understand both the issue the project is looking to address and the impact the solution will have on the community. From there, I would work to assess if there are concessions or adjustments that could be made to bring everyone on board. Though I cannot guarantee that every discussion will lead all concerns being addressed, I am committed to hearing all sides and seeking alternative solutions to help us improve safety across Boston while also weighing input from the community.

5. Boston’s inclusionary development policy (IDP) program requires that new developments of 10 units or more include at least 13% of the new units be affordable and income-restricted. There is conversation about increasing the IDP percentage; however, experience and research around the country has shown that setting an IDP percentage too high can actually reduce the total number of new affordable units built. Would you support a new 12 unit building where 50% of the units are affordable over a 60 unit building where 20% of the units are affordable? Why?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Not all buildings are created equally and not all neighborhoods are the same. As a blanket policy, I would more likely support a 60 unit building with 20% affordable units, as it would net 12 affordable units while more heavily increasing our overall housing stock. However, I always want to weigh all of the factors in play here: what would 48 non-restricted units do to prices in the neighborhood? Would we risk additional displacement as a result of a large-scale development like this with unchecked housing prices?
I am in favor of examining a more comprehensive proposal that sets the IDP % based on a variety of factors, including proposed and likely future development, current neighborhood composition, and whether or not the neighborhood is a candidate for an anti-displacement overlay district designation.

6. Housing a Changing City: Boston 2030 determined that Boston needed 69,000 new homes by 2030. The last public update (Q4 2019) indicated that the city is likely behind schedule. The current lengthy permitting process in Boston is a well-known barrier to meeting this challenge. How would you reduce timelines and unnecessary costs to create more homes for people in neighborhoods across the city?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

Boston needs a comprehensive zoning overhaul, the first since 1965. The current process rewards those with the connections to be able to pursue exceptions and waivers and creates unnecessary barriers for those looking to ethically improve the city’s housing stock. As these updates will likely take time, we should investigate other avenues to make our zoning process easier to navigate and more transparent.
While we work towards that future, we can make other adjustments to support faster, smarter, more people-centered development. Taking aim at controversial or manipulated zoning restrictions in an effective, one-off tactic to help keep development on track. One example of this is the proposal by Councilors Bok and O’Malley to eliminate parking restrictions for low-income projects. I would seek to identify and pursue these adjustments, while also examining where overlay districts would be beneficial to both help and protect our communities.

7. What actions or policies that fall under existing municipal powers (i.e. do not require a home rule petition) do you support to help prevent displacement?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

As mentioned above, pushing for overlay districts and creating anti-displacement zones is one way that the city can act without getting Beacon Hill involved.
In addition, the city has the power to expand how it funds and supports low-income housing support, through both the IDP and linkage fees. In both of these areas, I would seek to extract more from developers to better support keeping our neighborhoods affordable for all. I would seek to increase the IDP and, though the linkage fees were increased this year, will examine them yearly to ensure that they are adequate.

8. In a new housing development where space is limited, and parking adds substantially to the cost, how would you prioritize space/think about tradeoffs (between more units, parking, open space, etc.)? What would you do in the face of community opposition to developments that seek to balance these priorities?

Stephen McBride

Stephen McBride

In every project, I’m committed to understanding the impacts on the surrounding community. The answers won’t always be easy and they’ll rarely be uncontroversial, but I believe that finding compromise is the key to success. For parking requests, I would want to weigh the current state of parking in the area, how many units or spaces are being considered, and the sentiment of the surrounding community. We must be willing to work together to make decisions that serve the best interest of our communities.

Top

 

Additional Questions

The candidate has chosen an answer among these options; click on any button with shadow (like the Somewhat Support button below) to read the candidate's additional explanation:

Strongly Support

Somewhat Support

candidate's explanation

Neither Support nor Oppose

Somewhat Oppose

Strongly Oppose

1. The Massachusetts Vision Zero Coalition supports the removal of direct policing from Vision Zero goals, citing issues of safety and equity and a lack of effectiveness in improving safety. You can read about these issues in the Boston Vision Zero Progress Report and the Coalition Statement on Gov. Baker Administration’s Road Safety Legislation. Do you support removing police enforcement from Vision Zero?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

We should only have the police involved in the most dangerous behaviors, such as a failure to yield while turning and speeding. In addition to securing this commitment, we should continue to request consistent reporting to build trust within our communities.

2. Police details are often required for construction projects and open streets events -- it would save money and create jobs if community members were allowed to do this work. Civilian flaggers were first authorized in 2008 to help fill these roles in Massachusetts; nevertheless, these projects and events are still primarily staffed by police on overtime, and detail requests often go unfilled entirely. Do you support reducing police involvement in streets-related projects and events?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

Allowing civilians to be flaggers at construction sites and details at public events would have numerous benefits, as listed above. I attended the Trans-Resistance March this year and it was held entirely without police involvement, showing that it is entirely possible to be done safely.

3. One key strategy that has been proven to effectively reduce speeding, improve safety, and remove racial bias in traffic enforcement in other states and countries is automated enforcement (i.e. speed cameras and red light cameras). If the State House passes automated enforcement legislation that allows cities & towns to opt-in to a speed or red light camera program, would you support your municipality using this tool?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

We should absolutely take advantage of any tools that help improve traffic safety while reducing the opportunity for bias or otherwise unfair enforcement. Using this, we can make an immediate impact on areas where we know speeding and red-light running are especially problematic.

4. The Boston Transportation Department’s Neighborhood Slow Streets program has been very popular when implemented on smaller neighborhood-level streets, but many injuries from traffic crashes happen on busier arterial roads. Do you support traffic calming for high-crash intersections and roadways of arterials to prevent crashes and save lives, even when it means taking away parking or travel lanes?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

We should work to understand the impact of any projects. Introducing calming measures to improve safety within our neighborhood should almost always be possible, but we should always work with the surrounding community to understand how any changes would be received.

5. The Go Boston 2030 plan was released in 2017. Do you support updating the plan and working to advance the plan’s goals?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

We must consistently revisit any long-term plan to be sure that it is still focused on solving the community concerns that it was created to address. There may likely be changes that could substantially change the impact of a project and we should be agile enough to accommodate that reality.

6. Mode shift occurs when people get out of their cars and choose other ways of getting around. Do you support the City’s Go Boston 2030 goal of reducing car trips by 50% by 2030?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

Improving the efficiency and affordability of our public transportation should lead to more Bostonians being able to utilize the MBTA and reduce the need to use their vehicle.

7. Do you support reassessing the plans and viability of major capital projects, such as the Northern Avenue Bridge or the Rutherford Avenue redesign?

Stephen McBride

Neither Support nor Oppose

I would be interested in understand any concerns with the designs as they exist and work to push for improvements that would benefit the interconnectivity that the projects are focused around.

8. How curb space is managed can impact many different city functions, including bus service, commercial delivery, and residential parking. When used effectively, curb space can speed up bus service with dedicated lanes, create safe biking infrastructure, and/or allow businesses to quickly and safely receive deliveries. Do you support conducting a city-wide parking study to evaluate how effectively curb space is being used?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

9. Do you support charging an annual fee for residential parking permits?

Stephen McBride

Somewhat Support

I want to ensure that it does not place an undue financial burden on any low-income households, but yes, I believe that an annual fee for permits (especially an escalating one for additional vehicles) is worth considering.

10. Do you support free bus service on the MBTA and a low-income fare option for other public transit options?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

Households that already spend a disproportionate amount of time in transit often also spend an outsized portion of their income. While we work to make our transit system more efficient, we should ensure that it is not cost-burdening low-income families.

11. Boston has many traffic signals that do not work well for pedestrians. Do you support making signal timing safer and more convenient for people crossing at all speeds, including those walking and using mobility assistive devices?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

Any improvements that can be made to ensure our streets are safe for all pedestrians are worthwhile.

12. Do you support ensuring large-scale developments (including Sullivan Square, the Allston I-90 Interchange, and Suffolk Downs) incorporate the community's desire for walkability, connectivity, open space, and resilience?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

As we envision the Boston of the future, we should do so with a lens towards what the city can be, not what it is or has been. Walkable and connected neighborhoods will increase the quality of life across the city.

13. Do you support prioritizing and advancing the housing production goals outlined in the 2018 update to Housing a Changing City: Boston 2030?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

14. Lawsuits filed against two much needed, 100% affordable housing developments in Jamaica Plain have recently underscored how mandatory parking minimums can be weaponized within the legal system to significantly slow or prevent affordable housing. Do you support the proposal by Councilors Matt O’Malley and Kenzie Bok to update the zoning code to eliminate mandatory parking minimums for affordable housing?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

We must update our zoning code and I am committed to pushing for comprehensive changes that bring our city out of 1965 and into 2021.

15. Given the affordability crisis, many are critical of the perceived large amount of new “luxury” construction and would like to see more moderately priced housing options being built. Yet, the city’s zoning code mandates strict parking minimums for any new housing development, and parking is expensive (a single structured parking space adds an average of $50,000 in per-unit costs). This substantial cost often pushes otherwise moderately priced new housing into the “luxury” price range. In order to increase the amount of moderately priced homes in the city, would you support reducing mandatory parking minimums for all new development city-wide?

Stephen McBride

Somewhat Support

I would not want to commit to a city-wide change without understand the impacts across all of Boston. I am committed to exploring all avenues that help us prioritize affordable housing.

16. The City of Boston has devoted significant resources and conducted extensive community processes to develop neighborhood-based plans (i.e. PLAN: JP/Rox, PLAN: South Boston Dorchester Ave). However, the city has failed to incorporate these plans into the zoning code, perpetuating a system of parcel-by-parcel discretion and diminishing public trust in the planning process. Do you support codifying these and future plans into the city’s zoning code within a reasonable time frame (six months of a plan’s release)?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

17. The City of Boston and Boston Housing Authority have recently launched a city project-based housing voucher program. Do you support continued funding for this program, and do you support expanding it to include additional funding and/or a mobile voucher program?

Stephen McBride

Strongly Support

Top